Friday, August 31, 2012

Saint Augustine: The Movie -- A Review


Early in “Restless Heart,” the old Bishop Augustine (acting as a narrator for his early life) says, “My mother, who bore me into this world…” and immediately we’re looking at a screaming Saint Monica and a midwife urging her to push. The first thought that came to my mind was, “Really?” But the scene turns out to be not so bad, even kind of inspiring. Which is a good summation of the whole movie.

“Restless Heart” depicts the life of Saint Augustine of Hippo through the completion of his most widely-read work, The Confessions, but it begins and ends with the old Bishop Augustine facing off against Vandal hoards and proud, short-sighted Romans in his final days. This narrative frame allows voice-over narration from The Confessions themselves, which early on the filmmakers use to emphasize events directly from the book (yes, you’ll see teenage Augustine stealing pears—but he’s not very good at it).  The passages from The Confessions become increasingly moving as the film climaxes into his conversion to love and truth.

I have to admit that such cinematic events give me trepidation. A few years ago I got involved in the viral marketing campaign of a film featuring a beloved Catholic saint. After weeks (months?) of spreading the word, I discovered it was a mediocre trifle. The folks behind “Restless Heart,” Ignatius Press Films, are planning a similar campaign, but in this case there is an engaging, though flawed, film at its heart.

Part of the superiority of Restless Heart is the greater “filmability” of the source material—no doubt many Catholics have mused, “Augustine’s such a great sinner, his life would make a great movie.” But despite that, no one has succeeded in doing it until now. If Hollywood, say, Jude Apatow (think Knocked Up, Bridesmaids) were making this movie, we’d have to “enjoy” every bit of raunch and pomp in Augustine’s early life before Learning Our Lesson About Growing Up in the latter section. In the hands of a Catholic production company, the debauchery is handled more discreetly, although little touches convey the ugly lasciviousness of Roman aristocracy. Augustine clearly partakes early on (“Hey, Auggie, you left a bracelet at my place last night”--I'm not kidding), but his relationship with his concubine Callida is portrayed with a sympathetic, if sentimental, dignity. Or rather, Callida is portrayed with sympathetic dignity, and the lovers' affection is genuine—if never exactly a relation of equals. Augustine comes off as a good-hearted but self-absorbed lover and a distant father. It's probably fair.

Where the film is particularly strong is in showing how love and truth, which is to say conscience, tug at Augustine, even as he becomes a spectacular but slimy lawyer and later a silver-tongued puppet in the imperial court (oddly enough, the actor, Alessandro Preziosi, is the child of lawyers and has a law degree himself) . Outside of a couple major acts of cowardice, Augustine is generally gracious to his tenacious mother Monica (Monica Guerritore), even as he vilifies her faith and her church community in public. The film really begins to shine when Augustine, who works himself into a lather of apparent conviction for a big performance, is pitted against the churchman Ambrose of Milan (Andrea Giordana), who has equal rhetorical mettle but also the convictions to back it. It’s no wonder the young man is drawn to Ambrose even as his job is to publicly destroy him.

By the time Augustine’s heart finally does thaw, we’ve gotten a thorough look at his intellectual and cultural world through his creepy and ambitious pagan friend Valerius (Johannes Bandrup), his eerie Manichean benefactor (whose mantra “No one is responsible for anything” drew laughs from the Catholic audience), his cheerful but soulless teacher Macrobius (Dietrich Hollinderbäumer), and the controlled and controlling empress mother Justina (who looks a lot to me like Heather Graham). In Augustine’s world, philosophy and religion are divided, and the justice system, the government, and the military espouse whatever bring them convenience or glory. The credibility of the Christian claim—made present through the righteous Ambrose, the long-suffering Monica, and a Truth that seeks him out—becomes overwhelming, despite its cost to his ambition. Restless Heart thus conveys the central drama of The Confessions to the screen, an achievement not to be underestimated.

I have two main reservations in recommending the film. The line “these are facts, not words” is repeated ad nauseum early in the film, and it is used primarily by Augustine’s teacher and then Augustine himself to seduce their listeners into making words seem like and replace facts. A movie based on real events presents images that seem like facts, but can be equally deceptive. I will leave the full fact check to real classical scholars; I am particularly concerned with one. We see the older Augustine only as a man of peace. In reality, Augustine approved the use of force to stem religious dissension, which is a difficult part of his legacy to handle here, but to bring up the Donatist controversy without addressing this legacy is disconcerting. The late encounter with the Donatists is, for me, the movie’s main false note, showing us only what we want to remember about the Doctor of Grace. This gives us a more edifying film but not, as we were implicitly promised, the complete picture.

My other reservation concerns the conversion itself. After all that Augustine has experienced, which the film helpfully recaps in flashback form, he has plenty of reasons to convert. But the conversion itself is portrayed as a kind of emotional collapse. What’s missing is the continuation of what Luigi Giusanni calls “the itinerary of conviction,” beyond the first day Augustine accepted faith. We see unbelieving Augustine, struck-by-grace Augustine, and then ordained bishop Augustine. We miss how this faith grew in plausibility through his post-conversion experiences. The movie omits, for instance, that after his famous experience in the garden, Augustine gathered with friends who concurred with the reasonableness of his new direction due to other's experiences.

Instead, the filmmakers swing for the fences, trying to use cinematic techniques and imagery to portray an inner transformation. The imagery is strong, but the cinematic techniques lead to at least one eye-rolling moment. Perhaps this sequence will be fine for Christian audiences, but for unsympathetic viewers the film wastes some of the good will built up during Augustine’s Roman career. Such missteps are ultimately forgivable because this is an adaptation, and we can be convinced that Augustine really experienced this transformation from his writings. Still, the filmmakers would have been better off entrusting the transformation more fully to their actors.

So, on the last analysis, I absolutely recommend this film, on the strength of the acting, with the caveat that you can expect occasional deviations into schmaltz. The production design is professional enough to not draw too much attention to itself, although people who are sticklers for historical authenticity should ask other sticklers, not me. Most importantly, the “restless” heart of the story is preserved. If nothing else, you can now offer reluctant readers of The Confessions the choice to watch the movie instead. They won’t really get the whole of the book, but they will probably be more interested in reading it afterwards.